« FAQ: Does the LT increase demand or just shift it? | Main | Mainstream Media Meltdown »

April 09, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfb6353ef00d83423a20753ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Economics of Variety:

» The economics of already having it. from Useful Sounds - Nicole Simon's english [blog|podcast]
I like the long tail - in fact, I do see its effects everyday in my logfiles of my german blogs. I am eager to see how over time this blog will grow and I will get equally interesting, funny and scary results from search engines. :o) Chris Anderson... [Read More]

» NYT on Amazon's foray into POD publishing from Tenebris
Like many journalists, Tedeschi seems skeptical and a bit bewildered by the idea that self-publishing could be taken seriously, digressing into an anecdote about some misguide... [Read More]

» L'abondance de choix en ligne accroît-elle ou non la demande ? from InternetActu.net
En décryptant, pour un livre à paraître pour 2006, des données issues de détaillants en ligne pour illustrer quantitativement les hypothèse formulées dans l'article "La Longue Queue", Chris Anderson s'interroge sur son blog : l'existence de la "L... [Read More]

» DVD sales slowing? from The Big Picture
As DVDs become ever more important to Hollywood, sales may be plateauing. Nearly 80% of American homes have a DVD player, and these late adapters seem to be buying fewer discs. Both Pixar and Dreamworks disappointed Wall Street recently, as The Incred... [Read More]

Comments

brian

what I think is happening is that consumers are finding they can more closely match their preferences with substitutes to mainstream products. That is, consumer utility and hence surplus increases, but it does not change how much overall they spend on goods/content/entertainment. While some smaller niches may find an audience it may be at the expense at the margins to the heavily marketed stuff.

Francis Hamit

There is always a trade off in consumer choice. This is basic economics and affects policy at all levels. One of the classic examples was the trade-off chart in my old Economics textbook that demonstrated the trade off between long-range bombers and new school buildings.

There the constraint was money. Here, the constraint is time. It takes time to find the items you want and, as demonstrated by Zipf's Principle of Least Effort, most people will buy what they are looking for the first place they find it rather than look for a lesser price. This is why retail stores place all those little items next to the cash register. Availability and convenience equals more sales. For that matter so called "convenience stores" like 7/11 make most of their money from milk, bread, beer and soft drinks which they sell for far more than the price at the local supermarket. What is sold is not so much the product as the fact that it is available, right now.

Electronic distribution has two effects on this model. It widens the field of possible customers and shortens the search time. The dimunation of book sales is probably due to the rise of a more efficent aftermarket for used books through Amazon and eBay. Amazon Marketplace has over 800,000 third party providers now. That's a win-win situation. Amazon has no inventory or labor costs and makes a commission for every sale, the customers have a wider choice of available copies and the sellers are able to recycle old books at comparative advantage. What is worth 50 cents here may be worth 40 dollars someplace else.

In terms of new products, those produced in the electronic domain can be reproduced to meet all demands with almost no incremental costs beyond origination. The supply is infinite.

The cost to the consumer is less the money for the item than the time needed to consume it. Rental models like Netflix become very viable because usage and inventory are directly linked and consumers pay a very modest fee per use rather than buying and storing the same items in a collection (personal inventory).

While money cost is minimized,time cost is not and cannot be. Therefore consumer choices among a wider selection of products inevitabily means that some will sell less than if there were not so many alternatives available. Niche products very much depend on a lower cost of production and economic break-even point for their existance.

If we accept that there is only so much time and money available, the existance of wider choices represented by more niche products means that so called "mainstream" products will not sell as well.

Alex Rowland

The curve will most certainly flatten, but I think it is right to assume that spending on various forms of entertainment will probably not change too much from the 5-6% Chris mentioned. I think what has happened to many of these other forms of entertainment is that they have had to make way new entertainment sources (most prominently, video games) which are gradually clawing attention away from these other media. But the fact remains that while attention on entertainment will expand, revenue will not expand as appreciably. This is probably bad news for the mass market guys.

jake

I think you still need to ask "sales for who?" Take the music industry. While I think the long tail concept can be profitable for big retailers like Amazon, I'm not sure it allows more musicians to make a full-time living from music. So at that level, I'm not sure how sanguine I am about the long tail.

The 24 kinds of jam scenario plays out a lot in the music industry today. Before the long tail, it was probably harder for the average musician to crack through to a level where their music would be widely distributed outside of their region. But I suspect that those musicians who did crack through to this point had a reasonably good shot at sustaining a living from record sales and touring.

Today, I'm not so sure. It's so cheap to release a CD, that anyone can do it, and they do. It's also increasingly easier to make the CD available for sale nationally.

But it's much harder to actually let people know it exists, because the marketplace is so glutted. So I expect you have a lot more people selling 100-3000 CDs, which is great and it may well be that people like Amazon can make good money from this long tail of releases, but sales of 100-3000 CDs are not enough to sustain a career for most musicians.

And to the extent that digital distribution reduces the cost of production, I think this saving will be end up being spent on promotion and publicity, so it's not like that saving will go in the artist's pocket.

jake

I think you still need to ask "sales for who?" Take the music industry. While I think the long tail concept can be profitable for big retailers like Amazon, I'm not sure it allows more musicians to make a full-time living from music. So at that level, I'm not sure how sanguine I am about the long tail.

The 24 kinds of jam scenario plays out a lot in the music industry today. Before the long tail, it was probably harder for the average musician to crack through to a level where their music would be widely distributed outside of their region. But I suspect that those musicians who did crack through to this point had a reasonably good shot at sustaining a living from record sales and touring.

Today, I'm not so sure. It's so cheap to release a CD, that anyone can do it, and they do. It's also increasingly easier to make the CD available for sale nationally.

But it's much harder to actually let people know it exists, because the marketplace is so glutted. So I expect you have a lot more people selling 100-3000 CDs, which is great and it may well be that people like Amazon can make good money from this long tail of releases, but sales of 100-3000 CDs are not enough to sustain a career for most musicians.

And to the extent that digital distribution reduces the cost of production, I think this saving will be end up being spent on promotion and publicity, so it's not like that saving will go in the artist's pocket.

Greg

Your report that book sales are down really surprised me and made me try to think of reasons for this. Bookstores have always been with us, but they have gained a great deal more prominence recently, becoming huge big box warehouses with furniture and attached coffee bars, besides which Amazon, probably the web's largest retailer is still thought of by some, like myself as primarily a bookstore. My informal observations lead me to believe that people are reading more rather than less.

I really like another person's suggestion that sales being down may be a result of a better second hand market, the first thought that came to my mind is that there are many personal websites and forums which effectively displace the need for books of some kinds.

Where previously they sold books of household hints and handy tips they have websites where millions of tips are solicited from readers around the world. An infinite supply of recipies is available online and instruction and tutorials on how to use software, like Adobe Photoshop.

Since the expansion of the internet a lot the reasons we used to buy and keep nonfiction books we now turn to websites maintained by hobbyists or supported by advertising.

christmas gift ideas

Great review and sharing.I have read this post and just
wanted to say this theory is obsessed with the media.The content are not clear in it.I would like to request please share something about the borrow of phrase in the medium.Thanks.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Tidbits

The Long Tail by Chris Anderson

Notes and sources for the book

FREE was available in all digital forms--ebook, web book, and audiobook--for free shortly after the hardcover was published on July 7th. The ebook and web book were free for a limited time and limited to certain geographic regions as determined by each national publisher; the unabridged MP3 audiobook (get zip file here) will remain free forever, available in all regions.

Order the hardcover now!