[UPDATE: I've found an even better way to do this that costs $25, is simpler and works perfectly. It's here]
Once again I started a weekend with a crazy idea and once again I had it working by Sunday evening. (Needless to say I'm not going to win any parenting award until this particular obsession runs its course). This time it was trying to resolve a problem that cropped up in our Googleplex UAV mission. Many of the photos from that series are from angles, rather than straight down as you'd want for Google Maps imagery, because the airplane was banking quite a lot to keep within the boundaries of the Google campus.
The aerial photography pros solve this problem with expensive gyro-stabilized camera platforms. But to keep to our credo of making UAVs as cheap and easy as possible, I used stuff lying around the house to make a totally functional gyro-stabilized camera mount for less than $100.
The secret ingredient is an off-the-shelf "heading hold" gyro made for a R/C helicopter. These can be found for as little as $40, but after some experimentation I found that you need one that has special circuitry to resist gyro drift (there are several of them here, ranging from $74 to $199. I'm going to test several of them to find the cheapest one that works; right now I'm using one I had that doesn't have drift cancellation and it won't work for anything but benchtop tests)
For the tilting camera mount and base, you'll need a sheet of relatively thin aluminum. I used a .032 X 6 X 12 sheet. Anything thicker won't bend properly. I cut out several prototypes from cardboard before committing to metal (and still had to do the metal twice, when the first sheet proved to be too thick). I've made a pdf that you can print out and use as a template (when printing, set "page scaling" to "none" so it prints full-size). This one was designed for a Canon Digital Elph camera (all the recent vintages, from the 500 to 900 series, are about the same size); if you're using a different camera you may need to modify some dimensions slightly to fit.
One of the other problems that cropped up on the Googleplex mission was that we needed to take pictures much faster--at least twice a second. That means putting the camera in "continuous shooting" mode, which unfortunately can't be triggered with the computer-controlled IR trigger we used on the Pentax. So I also included a mechanical shutter switch, which is the blue servo in the top picture. It just holds the shutter down when activated, either by the on-board computer or manually with a switch on the R/C transmitter.
Here's a video of the whole thing at work, strapped to the bottom of our Predator UAV:
As always, you can follow the whole project on my other blog at DIYDrones.com.
Cool thing. But didn't you forget the instability of the plane around the pitch axix?
Posted by: Bodenseepeter | August 14, 2007 at 12:30 AM
Not forgotten at all, just not solved yet! Although in practice the tilting problem is much worse along the roll axis (which we have solved) than the pitch axis. That's because the plane doesn't have to pitch to turn and it's inherently more stable along that axis because of the conventional wing-and-elevator configuration (a flying wing would be tougher).
Also, the good thing about any instability around the pitch axis is that it leads to tilting that's along the path of the plane. So when the software tries to stitch the images together to make the strips that we mosaic to create an overhead map, it can at least find feature overlaps from adjacent images, even if they've been pitch tilted (they're either where we're going to be shortly or where we've just been). That's not the case if they've been roll tilted, since those images tend to be off to one side or the other.
Make sense?
-c
Posted by: Chris Anderson | August 14, 2007 at 08:18 AM
You might want to try disassembling the camera, to get at the shutter release circuit. In most cameras, it's a 2 position switch - position 1 is auto focus, position 2 triggers the shutter. This way, you can fire it with either 1 or 2 channels, ditch the servos, and gain weight capacity and servos for the other gyro axis.
Posted by: Jack Poller | August 14, 2007 at 10:04 AM
Chris,
There are also software solutions for registration of data that have not been taken at precise orthogonal positions, altitude, latitude/longditude etc.... Send me some of your image data and I'll register them for you to illustrate.
Bryan
Posted by: BWJones | August 15, 2007 at 11:49 AM
Really nice, your creativity and the attitude of trying new things is highly appreciable. Hope it is working well, I'm really expecting some big project from you.I strongly believe you can...
Driving Within Denmark
Posted by: Peter | August 18, 2007 at 08:43 AM
Really nice, your creativity and the attitude of trying new things is highly appreciable. Hope it is working well, I'm really expecting some big project from you.I strongly believe you can...
Driving Within Denmark
Posted by: Peter | August 18, 2007 at 08:43 AM
That's cool, but why not just use a big kite? That's what I've done and it works like a charm.
Posted by: Bob Aman | August 26, 2007 at 04:08 AM
very interesting posts.
Posted by: Stefan S. | September 04, 2007 at 05:52 PM
thanks...
Kabin
Konteyner
Posted by: kabin | June 13, 2009 at 10:26 AM